NO VOTER - NO FRAUD
As I was driving and listening to Durken's closing arguments, I was struck by this quote.
"At no time have the Republican's been able to tie a fraudulent vote to a voter.
They have not meet the intent of the law, which requires them to identify the fraudulent voter."
I thought I heard this wrong until it was repeated on a later talk radio show.
So if you follow this logic, then none of the 800-3000 (depending on who you listen too)
King County ballots that have no reconciled voter to account for their existence would be a
reason to invalidate the election. In fact, since there was no possible way to find out who cast
the counted ballot. You can not use this a reason to invalidate any election. Or in other words,
if Judge Bridges rules in favor of the Democrat's in this election. Let the ballot stuffing begin! For
no election can be over turned, if you can not attribute a voter to any of the additional ballots.
Boy, that really makes me feel warm inside. How about you?
- posted by Mike @ 6:24 PM