More on gay marriage
Childless heterosexual couples and marriage? First of all, the is a great difference between "do not intend" and
"incapable". That said, about 1% of all heterosexual couples are genetically unable to have children.
But 100% of homosexual couple are genetically unable to have children without outside intervention.
I believe the current scientific premise explaining propagation of a species is called the "Theory of Evolution".
Our society currently does not allow people of a similar genetic backgrounds (IE: direct family members to
first cousins) to marry because of the deleterious effects found in the offspring produced.

Now for the history, please look at the lineage for the Royal family in Great Britain. The Hanover line ascended
to the throne after the previous lineage (Stuart) was unable to produce an heir. This is only one example,
but you will find this as a recurring theme throughout history of Great Briton, France, Germany, Nigeria,
India, etc. At no time has the Stuart's marriage been considered invalid by the state or the church. But
this couple's fate had an effect on history, obviously negative for the Stuart's, but one whose ripples
are still felt today. Marriage has been the glue in successful societies.

If you delve into the history deeper, you will find several Monarch's who went to extremes to "preserve
the family line". In order to do that, some people were put to death. This was done to sanctify the following marriage
in the eyes of the church and nation at that time in history. (NO, I do not condone these actions but it is what happened.)
- posted by Mike @ 3:15 PM